Polity and Society in India PYQ 2020
Read paper here or download the pdf file and share it with your mates
Q1. Discuss the salient political events in
independent India.
Ans. Independent India has
witnessed numerous significant political events since gaining independence from
British colonial rule on August 15, 1947. Here are some of the
salient political events in independent India:
1. Integration of Princely States (1947-1950): After independence, India faced the challenge
of integrating over 500 princely states into the newly formed nation. The
successful negotiation and integration of these states into the Indian Union,
including the difficult cases of Hyderabad and Jammu and Kashmir, were crucial
for India’s territorial integrity.
2. First General Elections (1951-1952): India conducted its first general elections in
1951-52, establishing the world’s largest democracy. The Indian National
Congress, led by Jawaharlal Nehru, secured a resounding victory, reaffirming
India’s commitment to democratic governance.
3. Nehruvian Era (1947-1964): Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, played a pivotal role
in shaping the country’s foreign policy, industrialization, and socialist
economic planning. The period was marked by the adoption of the Five-Year
Plans, the establishment of public sector enterprises, and a non-aligned
foreign policy.
4. Sino-Indian War (1962): India’s conflict with China in 1962 over territorial disputes in the
Himalayas had a significant impact on Indian politics and foreign policy. It
led to a reevaluation of India’s defense and border policies.
5. Indo-Pak Wars (1947-1948, 1965, 1971, and 1999): India fought several wars with
Pakistan over issues like Kashmir and Bangladesh’s independence. The 1971 war
resulted in the creation of Bangladesh, marking a significant political
development in the region.
6. Emergency (1975-1977): Indira Gandhi’s declaration of a state of emergency in 1975, suspending
civil liberties and suppressing political dissent, was a controversial and
turbulent period in Indian politics. It ended with the defeat of the ruling
party in the 1977 elections and the restoration of democracy.
7. Economic Reforms (1991): The economic liberalization and reforms of 1991, initiated by
then-Finance Minister Manmohan Singh, shifted India from a closed, socialist
economy to a more market-oriented one. This policy shift had far-reaching
consequences on India’s economic growth.
8. Babri Masjid Demolition (1992): The demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya
by Hindu extremists in 1992 triggered communal violence and had significant
political repercussions, leading to a polarized political landscape.
9. Kargil Conflict (1999): The Kargil War between India and Pakistan over the Line of Control in
Kashmir was a major conflict in the late 1990s. India’s successful military
operation bolstered its position on the international stage.
10. Nuclear Tests (1998): India’s nuclear tests in 1998 marked the country’s declaration as a
nuclear weapons state. This had significant implications for regional security
dynamics and India’s international relations.
11. Economic Growth and Globalization (2000s): India experienced significant economic growth
and globalization in the 2000s, becoming one of the world’s fastest-growing
major economies. This period saw the expansion of the information technology
and outsourcing industries.
12. Landmark Supreme Court Judgments: The Indian Supreme Court has delivered several
landmark judgments that have shaped social and political discourse, including
those related to environmental protection, women’s rights, and individual
liberties.
13. Goods and Services Tax (GST) (2017): The implementation of the GST, a comprehensive
indirect tax reform, aimed at streamlining the tax structure and promoting ease
of doing business in India.
These are
just a few of the key political events that have shaped independent India.
India’s political landscape continues to evolve, reflecting its diverse and dynamic
society.
Q2. Explain how does Anthropology contributes
to our understanding of the complex relationship between culture, politics and
political practice in South Asia, more specifically in India?
Ans. Anthropology plays a
crucial role in unraveling the intricate interplay between culture, politics,
and political practice in South Asia, including India. It offers a unique lens
through which we can analyze and comprehend the complexities of this
relationship. Here’s how anthropology contributes to our
understanding of this dynamic:
1. Cultural Context of Politics:
Anthropology delves deep
into the cultural aspects of politics. It examines how cultural norms, values,
and practices influence political behavior, decision-making, and governance. For
instance, studying rituals, ceremonies, and symbols can reveal the cultural
underpinnings of political authority and legitimacy in India.
2. Ethnographic Research:
Anthropologists conduct
ethnographic research, which involves prolonged engagement with communities and
individuals. This method allows them to explore the everyday lives of people
and how politics intersects with their cultural practices. Ethnography helps in
uncovering the lived experiences of marginalized communities, shedding light on
their political struggles and aspirations.
3. Identity Politics:
India is known for its
diverse ethnic, religious, linguistic, and caste-based identities.
Anthropologists study how these identities are constructed, negotiated, and
mobilized in the political arena. They examine the role of identity politics in
shaping electoral strategies, party formation, and coalition dynamics.
4. Tribal and Indigenous Politics:
South Asia, including
India, is home to numerous tribal and indigenous communities. Anthropologists
specialize in studying these communities’ political struggles, land rights
movements, and efforts to protect their cultural heritage. This research
informs policymakers about the unique challenges faced by these groups.
5. Gender and Politics:
Anthropology places a
strong emphasis on gender studies. It explores how gender roles, norms, and
power dynamics influence political participation, representation, and
decision-making. This perspective has been instrumental in understanding the
challenges women face in Indian politics.
6. Conflict and Social Movements:
Anthropologists often
engage in the study of social movements and conflicts. They analyze the root
causes of political unrest, the role of cultural symbols and narratives in
mobilization, and the impact of state policies on marginalized communities.
This research contributes to conflict resolution and peace-building efforts.
7. Local Governance and Decentralization:
India’s decentralized
governance system is a complex arena where local cultures, power dynamics, and
political practices intersect. Anthropologists study how local leaders exercise
authority, resolve disputes, and engage with state institutions. This knowledge
informs the design of effective decentralization policies.
8. Healthcare and Development Programs:
Anthropologists examine
how cultural beliefs and practices influence the acceptance and effectiveness
of healthcare and development interventions. They assess the socio-cultural
factors that shape political decisions regarding resource allocation and public
policies.
9. Rural-Urban Dynamics:
India’s rapid urbanization raises
questions about the transformation of cultural practices and political
engagement in urban settings. Anthropology investigates how rural-urban
migration and the blending of diverse cultures impact politics and social
movements in urban areas.
In essence, anthropology provides an in-depth
understanding of the cultural nuances that underlie political processes in
South Asia, including India. It offers insights into the complexities of
identity, governance, social justice, and grassroots activism, helping
policymakers, scholars, and civil society actors make more informed decisions
in this diverse and dynamic region.
Q3. Write an essay on the paradoxical character
of state in India.
Ans. Title: The Paradoxical Character of the State in
India
Introduction:
The Indian
state is a paradoxical entity that embodies contradictions, complexities, and
diversity like few other nations in the world. Since its independence in 1947,
India has been navigating a path shaped by historical, cultural, and political
paradoxes. This essay explores the paradoxical character of the Indian state,
highlighting how it simultaneously reflects both unity and diversity, democracy
and authoritarianism, and progress and stagnation.
Unity in Diversity:
One of the
defining paradoxes of the Indian state is the concept of “Unity in
Diversity.” India is a land of remarkable diversity, encompassing multiple
languages, religions, cultures, and traditions. Despite this diversity, the
Indian state has managed to maintain its unity through a democratic framework
and constitutional principles. It’s a paradoxical challenge to govern such a
vast and diverse nation while upholding the principles of pluralism and
inclusivity.
Democracy and Authoritarianism:
India
proudly proclaims itself as the world’s largest democracy, yet it grapples with
elements of authoritarianism and centralization. While democratic institutions
like elections and a vibrant civil society flourish, there are concerns about
increasing centralization of power, erosion of institutions, and the stifling
of dissent. The Indian state is paradoxically a democratic republic that
occasionally exhibits authoritarian tendencies.
Economic Growth and Persistent Poverty:
India is
one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, with a burgeoning middle class
and a thriving technology sector. However, this economic progress coexists with
persistent poverty, income inequality, and a vast informal labor force. The
paradox lies in the simultaneous presence of wealth and destitution, economic
growth and social disparities.
Secularism and Religious Tensions:
India’s
Constitution enshrines secularism as a fundamental principle, emphasizing the
separation of religion from the state. Paradoxically, religious tensions and
communalism continue to pose significant challenges. The Indian state is tasked
with maintaining religious harmony while dealing with occasional outbreaks of
violence and sectarianism.
Efficient Bureaucracy and Bureaucratic Red
Tape:
India
boasts a well-trained and efficient bureaucracy that plays a pivotal role in
policy implementation. However, it is also infamous for its bureaucratic red
tape, corruption, and delays. This paradox underscores the tension between administrative
efficiency and systemic inefficiencies.
Nationalism and Regionalism:
Indian
nationalism is a unifying force that binds the nation together. Simultaneously,
regional identities and aspirations persist, leading to demands for greater
autonomy and even secession. Balancing national integration with regional
autonomy is a constant challenge for the Indian state.
Conclusion:
The
paradoxical character of the Indian state reflects the multifaceted nature of
the nation itself. India’s history, culture, and societal complexities give
rise to these contradictions. Understanding and addressing these paradoxes is
essential for the state to navigate its path toward greater unity, democracy,
economic prosperity, and social justice. The Indian state’s ability to embrace
these paradoxes and transform them into opportunities will shape its future
trajectory on the global stage.
Q4. Discuss the role of caste in local level
politics in India.
Ans. Caste has long been a
dominant and influential factor in the political landscape of India,
particularly at the local level. It plays a multifaceted role in shaping local
politics, and its influence can be both positive and negative. Here, we delve into the role of caste in local level politics in
India:
Caste-Based Voting Patterns:
Caste
influences the voting behavior of people in local elections. Voters often align
themselves with candidates who belong to their caste or sub-caste, believing
that such candidates would better represent their interests.
Candidate Selection:
Political parties
often choose candidates based on their caste and community affiliations. This
is done to secure a dedicated vote bank for the party. The caste background of
a candidate can significantly impact their electability.
Reservation Policies:
India’s
reservation policies, such as quotas for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled
Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs), have a direct impact on local
politics. These reserved seats ensure representation for marginalized
communities at the grassroots level.
Influence on Local Governance:
In many
villages and panchayats, caste-based factions and groups play a dominant role
in local governance. Village councils often comprise members from specific
castes, and they wield significant power in decision-making.
Social Solidarity and Conflict:
Caste-based
politics can foster social solidarity within a community, as it provides a
platform for collective action and representation. However, it can also lead to
inter-caste conflicts, particularly in situations where there is competition
for resources and political power.
Clientelism and Patronage:
Caste-based
politics can perpetuate clientelism and patronage networks. Local leaders often
distribute favors, resources, and benefits to their caste members, reinforcing
their influence and control.
Challenges to Progressive Policies:
Caste-based
politics can hinder the implementation of progressive policies. Dominant castes
may resist measures aimed at social justice and equal opportunities, especially
when they perceive such policies as a threat to their privileges.
Intersectionality with Gender:
Caste
intersects with gender, impacting the participation of women in local politics.
Women from marginalized castes often face multiple layers of discrimination and
may find it challenging to engage in political activities.
Changing Dynamics:
While caste
remains a powerful force in local politics, urbanization, education, and
economic development are gradually changing the dynamics. Younger generations
are often less beholden to traditional caste affiliations and may prioritize
other factors when voting.
In
conclusion, the
role of caste in local level politics in India is deeply ingrained and
continues to influence electoral outcomes and governance. While it can be a
tool for social justice and representation, it also presents challenges related
to social conflict, patronage, and resistance to change. Understanding the
nuances of caste-based politics is essential for effective policymaking and
promoting inclusive and equitable local governance.
Q5. Elaborate on the nature of Indian
nationalism.
Ans. Indian nationalism is
a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that has evolved over centuries. It
represents the collective identity, aspirations, and struggle for
self-determination of the diverse peoples of India. The nature of Indian
nationalism can be understood through the following key aspects:
Historical Roots:
Indian
nationalism has deep historical roots, dating back to ancient and medieval
periods. The concept of a united India with a shared cultural and
civilizational heritage existed even before British colonialism.
Anti-Colonialism:
Modern
Indian nationalism emerged as a response to British colonial rule. The
exploitation and suppression by the British Empire galvanized Indians to unite
and demand independence. Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru
played pivotal roles in the anti-colonial struggle.
Inclusivity:
Indian
nationalism is characterized by its inclusivity. It transcends religious,
linguistic, and regional divides. The idea of unity in diversity is central to
Indian nationalism, emphasizing that all communities have a place within the
nation.
Secularism:
Secularism
is a fundamental tenet of Indian nationalism. The Indian Constitution enshrines
the principle of secularism, ensuring that the state remains neutral in matters
of religion and treats all religions equally.
Democratic Values:
Indian
nationalism is closely tied to democratic values and principles. The struggle
for independence was not just about ending colonialism but also about
establishing a democratic and inclusive nation.
Social Justice:
Indian
nationalism has a strong emphasis on social justice and equality. Leaders like
B.R. Ambedkar advocated for the rights of marginalized communities, leading to
the inclusion of reservation policies in the Constitution.
Pluralism:
Pluralism
is another defining feature of Indian nationalism. It recognizes and celebrates
the coexistence of diverse cultures, languages, and traditions within the
nation.
Non-Violence:
Mahatma
Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence (ahimsa) had a profound influence on Indian
nationalism. The non-violent resistance against colonial rule became a hallmark
of the Indian freedom struggle.
Continued Struggle:
Indian
nationalism did not end with independence. It has continued to evolve and adapt
to changing circumstances. Issues like linguistic identity, regional autonomy,
and economic development have shaped the post-independence nationalist
discourse.
Global Outlook:
Indian
nationalism is not isolationist but embraces a global outlook. India’s foreign
policy reflects its commitment to peace, cooperation, and global justice.
Challenges and Diverse Expressions:
Indian
nationalism is not without challenges. Regional aspirations, ethnic tensions,
and occasional conflicts test the unity of the nation. Additionally, there are
diverse expressions of nationalism, ranging from cultural to linguistic to
regional.
In summary, Indian nationalism is a complex and inclusive
concept that has evolved over centuries. It is rooted in a commitment to
democracy, secularism, social justice, and pluralism. While it has faced and
continues to face challenges, Indian nationalism remains a unifying force that
celebrates the diversity and unity of the nation.
Q6. How has the mobilization of various
sections of society strengthened Indian politics?
Ans. The mobilization of
various sections of society has significantly strengthened Indian politics by
promoting inclusivity, representation, and the pursuit of social justice. This mobilization has been instrumental in shaping the country’s
democratic landscape in several ways:
Representation of Marginalized Groups:
Mobilization
has empowered marginalized and underrepresented groups, such as Dalits,
Adivasis, women, and religious minorities, to demand their rightful place in
politics. Reserved seats, quotas, and affirmative action policies have provided
political space for these communities.
Social Justice Initiatives:
Mobilization
has led to the formulation and implementation of social justice initiatives,
including reservation policies in education and government jobs. These policies
have addressed historical inequalities and ensured the participation of
marginalized groups in public life.
Voice for Regional Aspirations:
Regional
mobilization has allowed different states and regions to assert their distinct
identities and aspirations. This has led to the decentralization of political
power, with regional parties playing a vital role in shaping national policies.
Women’s Empowerment:
The
mobilization of women’s groups and organizations has promoted gender equality
and women’s empowerment in Indian politics. This has resulted in the enactment
of laws and policies that protect women’s rights and increase their
participation in governance.
Cultural and Linguistic Diversity:
Mobilization
based on cultural and linguistic identities has preserved and celebrated
India’s diversity. It has also led to demands for the recognition of regional
languages and cultures, strengthening the federal structure of the country.
Environmental and Indigenous Movements:
Movements
focused on environmental protection and indigenous rights have gained
prominence. These movements have highlighted the importance of sustainable
development and the preservation of indigenous knowledge and resources.
Labor and Farmer Movements:
Labor
unions and farmer organizations have mobilized to advocate for workers’ and
farmers’ rights. They have influenced policies related to labor, land reform,
and agricultural practices.
Civil Society and NGOs:
Civil
society organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have played a
critical role in mobilizing communities for social causes, including education,
healthcare, and environmental conservation.
Youth Mobilization:
Youth-led
movements and activism have brought fresh perspectives and energy to Indian
politics. Young people have raised their voices on issues such as climate
change, corruption, and social justice.
Electoral Participation:
Mobilization
efforts have encouraged higher voter turnout and political engagement. Voter
education campaigns and awareness initiatives have contributed to a more
informed electorate.
Checks and Balances:
The
mobilization of various sections of society acts as a check on the government’s
power. It ensures that the government remains accountable to diverse interests
and addresses the concerns of different segments of the population.
In
conclusion, the
mobilization of various sections of society has enriched Indian politics by
fostering inclusivity, representation, and social justice. It has promoted the
active participation of previously marginalized groups and strengthened the
democratic fabric of the nation. This diversity of voices and perspectives
contributes to a more vibrant and responsive political system in India.